Every entry carries the settings that produced it. Filter, compare, learn.
Pick one or more to show only prints where those fields were changed from the slicer's defaults.
Each space-separated word is one condition; every condition must match (implicit AND — no need to type the word AND yourself).
Operators: key=value, key!=value, key>n, key<n,
key>=n, key<=n.
Available keys: rating, wave_version,
filament_type, printer_model, algo,
flow_mm3_per_mm, flow_ratio, line_spacing, line_width, print_speed, travel_speed, fan_speed, nozzle_temp, outer_perim, floor_layers, wall_loops, infill_density, infill_pattern,
Examples: rating=5 · flow_mm3_per_mm>=0.15 infill_density<20 ·
infill_pattern!=crosshatch wall_loops>=3
No prints match these filters.
Small amount of layer separation, as seen in photo 2. Minimal warping, only near the smaller waves. On the top side, the waves and perimeter do not properly connect, but can already be seen in the gcode viewer.
— Rob
Not a lot of warping, though there are some spots where there are gaps between tracks and the perimeter (See photo 2).
— Rob
Better overall compared to the last. Warping similar to last as well. The rough surface is less than before.
— Rob
Adhesion between base and overhang weak, line spacing causing issues near perimeter. Warping is less than last sample.
— Rob
The connection between the base of the model and the wave overhang is weak. A wavy pattern can be identified on the bottom and top surface again. Significant warping again
— Rob
First decent PLA-CF print. There is a weird texture on both the bottom and top surface, which could be the cause of too much overlap. Layer adhesion is better than PTSample25. A lot of warping is still observed.
— Rob
Tried with PLA-CF, no layer adhesion at all.
— Rob
Print quality overall very good, the main issue here is the amount of warping.
— Rob
Only a slight disconnection between the perimeter before the curve. Warping is the bigger issue
— Rob
Tried upping the wave flow to see effect. Apart from a small disconnection in the inner corner of the sample, the print looks great. A lot of warping is present though.
— Rob
Noticed underextrusion and simply no connection between the start of the curve in the overhang and the perimeter. A lot of warping present.
— Rob
A lot of overextrusion, very much visible on both the top and bottom. Warping caused the nozzle to interfere when printing the perimeters, causing the sample to fly off the build plate. Accidentally used the wrong filament profile, temperatures were higher than normally used.
— Rob
Rough perimeter and disconnection between waves and perimeter. A lot of warping but shape is there
— Rob
https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2151369/
— ja
Apart from the same artifact that appeared during the last sample, the print quality is overall very good, a lot of warping is identified.
— Rob
Tried another printer and the new Orcaslicer version for the first time. Noticed a lot of underextrusion with the same converted settings as PTSample 8 and 14. Also a new artifact appeared between corners.
— Rob
Just warping, no delamination. Underside looks flawless
— Cocoanix
Went insanely well but after floor layer was placed it just warped. Will try without floor layers.
— Cocoanix
Basically perfect (dirty nozzle caused black strings in print). I printed this for my youtube video that is in production.
— Cocoanix
Very low perimeter quality due to extremely low layer time.
— ja
Zig zag behaviour unexpectedly stops towards the end of the overhang.
— ja
Almost perfect, small disconnections between the perimeter, tried replicating the same result as PTSample8 and PTSample14, but with different filament
— Rob
Very similar results to 13, seems to pull back on the material
— Rob
Almost perfect again, wanted to replicate the result from PTSample8, same result is found.
— Rob
Same weird starting lines, looks like overextrusion but the parameters are roughly the same. *PATTERN USED IS "SMART", unlike photo*
— Rob
Weird starting lines, overall not very good quality though shape is properly retained
— Rob
Still shows signs of overextrusion, overall looks clean, nozzle still dragging across the layers.
— Rob
Shows signs of overextrusion, but overall looks clean. Nozzle is dragging across the layers.
— Rob
Shows signs of overextrusion, nozzle is dragging across the layers, causing them to disconnect near perimeter
— Rob
Almost perfect, not quite, perimeter on a different level than the rest of the overhang
— Rob
Waves not connected to the perimeter on a couple points
— Rob
Waves not connected to the perimeter on a couple points
— Rob
Generally dimensional inaccurate, perimeter on different level, edges not connected
— Rob
Very poor quality, not dimensionally accurate at all, a lot of underextrusion.
— Rob
Very poor quality, not dimensionally accurate at all. A lot of underextrusion
— Rob
Takes somewhat of a form, but still does not resemble the model
— Rob
Does not take form at all. Poor adhesion between layers
— Rob
