Community prints.

Tried upping the wave flow to see effect. Apart from a small disconnection in the inner corner of the sample, the print looks great. A lot of warping is present though.

— Rob

Noticed underextrusion and simply no connection between the start of the curve in the overhang and the perimeter. A lot of warping present.

— Rob

A lot of overextrusion, very much visible on both the top and bottom. Warping caused the nozzle to interfere when printing the perimeters, causing the sample to fly off the build plate. Accidentally used the wrong filament profile, temperatures were higher than normally used.

— Rob

Rough perimeter and disconnection between waves and perimeter. A lot of warping but shape is there

— Rob

https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2151369/

— ja

Slight warping

— ja

Apart from the same artifact that appeared during the last sample, the print quality is overall very good, a lot of warping is identified.

— Rob

Tried another printer and the new Orcaslicer version for the first time. Noticed a lot of underextrusion with the same converted settings as PTSample 8 and 14. Also a new artifact appeared between corners.

— Rob

Just warping, no delamination. Underside looks flawless

— Cocoanix

— ja

Went insanely well but after floor layer was placed it just warped. Will try without floor layers.

— Cocoanix

Good except for warping

— ja

Basically perfect (dirty nozzle caused black strings in print). I printed this for my youtube video that is in production.

Very low perimeter quality due to extremely low layer time.

— ja

Zig zag behaviour unexpectedly stops towards the end of the overhang.

— ja

Almost perfect, small disconnections between the perimeter, tried replicating the same result as PTSample8 and PTSample14, but with different filament

— Rob

Very similar results to 13, seems to pull back on the material

— Rob

Almost perfect again, wanted to replicate the result from PTSample8, same result is found.

— Rob

Same weird starting lines, looks like overextrusion but the parameters are roughly the same. *PATTERN USED IS "SMART", unlike photo*

— Rob

Weird starting lines, overall not very good quality though shape is properly retained

— Rob

Still shows signs of overextrusion, overall looks clean, nozzle still dragging across the layers.

— Rob

Shows signs of overextrusion, but overall looks clean. Nozzle is dragging across the layers.

— Rob

Shows signs of overextrusion, nozzle is dragging across the layers, causing them to disconnect near perimeter

— Rob

Almost perfect, not quite, perimeter on a different level than the rest of the overhang

— Rob

Waves not connected to the perimeter on a couple points

— Rob

Waves not connected to the perimeter on a couple points

— Rob

Generally dimensional inaccurate, perimeter on different level, edges not connected

— Rob

Very poor quality, not dimensionally accurate at all, a lot of underextrusion.

— Rob

Very poor quality, not dimensionally accurate at all. A lot of underextrusion

— Rob

Takes somewhat of a form, but still does not resemble the model

— Rob

Does not take form at all. Poor adhesion between layers

— Rob

— ja

— ja

— ja

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis

— Dennis