PTSample

Still not good, very similar to last PHA sample.

Line spacing might be too high, as the adhesion between layers is suffering (Classic ABS). Might be that this is printed in an open printer, will try later in an enclosed one. Warping is definitely less than the other ABS sample.

It is getting there, still testing settings.

First time ABS, printed in open air on the BBL A1 Mini. Layer adhesion is very good, only in the extremities there is some artifacting. Warps a lot though

Failed, not sure why yet exactly

It is getting there, on the good parts of the print, the curling is extreme

Not a lot to say for this one

Does not look well at all. It looks like a fly got stuck between two of the layers. Don't know exactly what needs changing yet.

Too much.

Even more warping caused by the line spacing.

Increased the line spacing too much, warping as a result of it.

Tried to mitigate the gaps by increasing the perimeter overlap. Might be the best sample so far. Waves are good and adhere well with each other.

Even bigger gaps near the perimeter, starting to become a problem especially in the inner corner. Waves once again look nice

Bigger gaps starting to form near the perimeter due to line spacing. Waves look nice

Print overall is very good, slight warping in the overhang caused some overextrusion in subsequent layers.

Not quite perfect, quite a bit of warping in the extremities. Between a 4 and 5 I would say

Even better than last sample. Warping only near the smaller wave segments but minimal. Tuning line spacing such that there is barely the adhesion to suspend the material mid air might give the best results. However, there are gaps starting to form near the perimeter as a result of the line spacing.

Very good sample, increased the line spacing to above 0.4 to 0.42. The only issue on this sample is the warping in the area with concentrated waves.

Small amount of layer separation, as seen in photo 2. Minimal warping, only near the smaller waves. On the top side, the waves and perimeter do not properly connect, but can already be seen in the gcode viewer.

Not a lot of warping, though there are some spots where there are gaps between tracks and the perimeter (See photo 2).

Better overall compared to the last. Warping similar to last as well. The rough surface is less than before.

Adhesion between base and overhang weak, line spacing causing issues near perimeter. Warping is less than last sample.

The connection between the base of the model and the wave overhang is weak. A wavy pattern can be identified on the bottom and top surface again. Significant warping again

First decent PLA-CF print. There is a weird texture on both the bottom and top surface, which could be the cause of too much overlap. Layer adhesion is better than PTSample25. A lot of warping is still observed.

Tried with PLA-CF, no layer adhesion at all.

Print quality overall very good, the main issue here is the amount of warping.

Only a slight disconnection between the perimeter before the curve. Warping is the bigger issue

Tried upping the wave flow to see effect. Apart from a small disconnection in the inner corner of the sample, the print looks great. A lot of warping is present though.

A lot of overextrusion, very much visible on both the top and bottom. Warping caused the nozzle to interfere when printing the perimeters, causing the sample to fly off the build plate. Accidentally used the wrong filament profile, temperatures were higher than normally used.

Rough perimeter and disconnection between waves and perimeter. A lot of warping but shape is there

Apart from the same artifact that appeared during the last sample, the print quality is overall very good, a lot of warping is identified.

Tried another printer and the new Orcaslicer version for the first time. Noticed a lot of underextrusion with the same converted settings as PTSample 8 and 14. Also a new artifact appeared between corners.

Almost perfect, small disconnections between the perimeter, tried replicating the same result as PTSample8 and PTSample14, but with different filament

Very similar results to 13, seems to pull back on the material

Almost perfect again, wanted to replicate the result from PTSample8, same result is found.

Same weird starting lines, looks like overextrusion but the parameters are roughly the same. *PATTERN USED IS "SMART", unlike photo*

Weird starting lines, overall not very good quality though shape is properly retained

Still shows signs of overextrusion, overall looks clean, nozzle still dragging across the layers.

Shows signs of overextrusion, but overall looks clean. Nozzle is dragging across the layers.

Shows signs of overextrusion, nozzle is dragging across the layers, causing them to disconnect near perimeter

Almost perfect, not quite, perimeter on a different level than the rest of the overhang

Waves not connected to the perimeter on a couple points

Waves not connected to the perimeter on a couple points

Generally dimensional inaccurate, perimeter on different level, edges not connected

Very poor quality, not dimensionally accurate at all, a lot of underextrusion.

Very poor quality, not dimensionally accurate at all. A lot of underextrusion

Takes somewhat of a form, but still does not resemble the model

Does not take form at all. Poor adhesion between layers